Ms. Townsend kicks off her article with:
"In her new book, "America by Heart," Palin objects to my uncle's famous 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, in which he challenged the ministers - and the country - to judge him, a Catholic presidential candidate, by his views rather than his faith. "Contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for president," Kennedy said. "I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president who happens also to be a Catholic."
Palin has really done nothing more than point up the fact that Kennedy chose to diminish his Catholic faith in order to get elected. I can't recall any other election in my lifetime where a candidates religious affiliation was such an issue. People were actually worried that if Kennedy was elected the Pope was going to be running the country."Palin writes that when she was growing up, she was taught that Kennedy's speech had "succeeded in the best possible way: It reconciled public service and religion without compromising either." Now, however, she says she has revisited the speech and changed her mind. She finds it "defensive . . . in tone and content" and is upset that Kennedy, rather than presenting a reconciliation of his private faith and his public role, had instead offered an "unequivocal divorce of the two."
Later in the article, Ms. Townsend makes this statement regarding Teddy Kennedy's stand on abortion and a woman's "right to choose."
I want to make sure I'm reading that correctly. Ms. Townsend thinks the the hierarchy of the Church is suddenly going to see the light and condone abortion? Obviously she has never heard of the deposit of faith and thinks the doctrines of the Church were cooked up in some smoky back room by a bunch of misogynous old men. The fact is, Ms Townsend, the doctrines of the Church haven't changed since Jesus founded His Church."Teddy Kennedy believed that his stands were at one with his faith. He did disagree with the Roman Catholic hierarchy at times. But as we have seen, the hierarchy's positions can change, and in our church, we have an obligation to help bring about those changes."
She would like the Church to focus on "social justice" and ignore the legitimate and authentic teachings of the Church - teachings that have never wavered for 2000 years. If the Church actually did that very thing, there wouldn't be a Church, which I suppose would make life simpler for Ms. Townsend and those that share her views.
Later she says:
No, Ms. Townsend, Palin didn't "presume to judge that he took positions directly at odds with his Catholic faith." It is public record that he most certainly took positions directly against the authentic teachings of the Church."And my uncle Teddy fought for health care for all Americans, even if in her book Palin presumes to judge that he took positions "directly at odds with his Catholic faith."
She attacks Palin for criticizing Nancy Pelosi:
"For instance, she criticizes Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), a Democrat and a faithful Catholic, for "talking the (God) talk but not walking the walk."
Once again we have that pesky little problem of the teachings of the Catholic Church. Palin's beliefs and actions are more in accord with these teachings then Ms. Pelosi, who refers to herself as an "ardent Catholic" while supporting abortion and same-sex "marriage." Those are not the actions of what would be called a faithful Catholic, Ms. Townsend. Those are actions of someone who could at best be called a "cafeteria" Catholic and at worst a heretic.Who is Palin to say what God's "walk" is? Who anointed her our grand inquisitor?"
Ms. Townsend spends the first half of her article claiming that JFK kept his Catholic faith separate from his politics and then states:
"Faith runs as a deep current through my family. Faith inspired my uncles' and my father's dedication to justice."
Which is it, Ms. Townsend? Was JFK a schizophrenic who parked his faith at the door to the oval office, or was he "inspired by his faith?""America's first and only Catholic president referred to God three times in his inaugural address and invoked the Bible's command to care for poor and the sick. Later in his presidency, he said, unequivocally, about civil rights: "We are confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the Scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution."
Discussion at Memeorandum
13 comments:
Once again Adrienne you are exactly on point. I do remember when JFK ran and the uncertainty of his Catholic faith vs his Democrat politics. As I said recently in my post at Conservative Outrage, I know only what is in the news. However, with the news of Teddy and his stand on abortion I am quite certain he is a cafeteria Catholic. Unfortunately JFK with most like be remembered for his MM connection. And, that ain't Mighty Mom..
Pops
Fantastic post, Adrienne!
I am looking forward to the days when there will be no more mention of Sarah Palin or any of the other "reality" Palins in the news or on entertainment television. It will happen and furthermore it will happen more quickly than anyone can imagine today.
But Sarah is right. JFK downplayed his religion in order to get elected. He or his dad did a couple of other things too but we won't get into that.
President Kennedy never allowed his personal faith be part of his life beinng President. Nor did Bobby or Teddy. What you practice in your personal faith is not what you practice in your elected offical stance as you go by the laws of the land, not the laws of any cult religion. I knew President Kennedy and Teddy and 87 of the whole Kennedy Family. Palin is running at the mouth because she has to sell her books. She even took an oath of office to be gov. of Alaska but she broke that oath to make a 7 Million Dollar Book Deal and more $ that came down the pike. She is bi-polar and needs to be on her prescription medications. The Kennedy Family has always been a family of service to the public and the poor and equality for all they have and continue to serve. Their Faith has always been a private matter as it should be with anyone.
Hey RTS,
So you're saying Catholicism is a cult, huh? Sounds like you're the one who needs to be back on his meds.
Retired, you are right.
I'd would rather elect someone willing to relinquish power over a title-clinging politician (i.e. Blagovich, Sanford, Chavez) who refuses to surrender power under any circumstances short of being indicted or ousted in a military coup.
"Quitting" isn't inherently bad, if done for the right reasons. In fact, let's look at her history. Did you know Palin "quit" another six figure job, her oil & gas ethics commissioner job before she became governor? She resigned to protest corruption when the sitting Republican governor wouldn't investigate the state party chair for sharing confidential state documents with an oil lobbyist. She quit because by law as a commissioner she couldn't go public with her concerns because of confidentiality rules. So she quit to be able to blow the whistle on collusion knowing it would probably kill any chance she had to succeed in state politics as a Republican. And you know what happened to that state party chair? He was later given the largest ethics fine in Alaska history, largely because Palin had the courage to put pressure on the governor's office and the Republican party. And what happened to Palin? She became Governor of Alaska.
Now let's look at her situation as governor.
Palin was paid roughly 337,500 in 32 months as governor. After 19 bogus ethics charges against her, she owed around 500,000 in legal fees to her attorney. The current laws of Alaska required that every single filed ethics complaint to be investigated no matter how ridiculous (being photographed with a fish, wearing a jacket with a logo, receiving "cookie" bribes) and all at the personal cost of the defendant. Had she stayed in office another 16 months, she likely would have been forced into bankruptcy because Alaska law does not automatically cover the legal defense of its governors nor was the Attorney General of the state or someone else designated by the state to defend her like all other states. If you were working in a job that was costing you almost twice as much to go into work everyday than you were making would you stay there?
Even her set up of a legal defense fund like other politicians have was deemed unethical (It was arguably the strictest legal defense fund in history with all the restrictions it had for those who could donate) wherein a politically motivated investigator suggested Palin should just let Alaska taxpayers pay for her legal defense. They wanted Alaskans to take the bullet for the political malice of Palin's enemies.. In less than a year, she racked up half-a-million (to put this in perspective, her salary as Governor was only 125,000 a year and she had even declined a 25,000 raise by the legislature) in legal charges with much more to come.
One can argue that she should have just fought her enemies instead of letting them win.
If you decide to continue fighting your enemies at the expense of the people you serve is that even ethical? If your presence in office is causing heavy collateral damage to your state, is it smart and ethical to remain in office no matter the cost? Has any politician at the state level attracted the volume of attacks directed at Palin? Is it normal for a governor to go personally bankrupt defending themselves against bogus ethics complaints? Palin incurred almost twice as much legal debt as the salary she drew as governor. Every day she spent in office she was one day closer to personal bankruptcy.
These frivolous lawsuits effectively paralyzed her administration by wasting time and money doing research for countless Freedom of Information Act requests and addressing the ethics charges. The estimated cost of wasted time for the State of Alaska was 2 million and rising. By resigning, she effectively short-circuited the process and brought the circus out of Alaska.
Jon Voight understands why Governor Palin resigned her position as Governor of Alaska. He tells the Anchorage Daily News the following:
"I sure would vote for her if she was running for president….Some people have said that they were upset with her for leaving the governorship when she did. I disagree with those people. I think she saved Alaska with that move. She had capable people who were going to take over … She was being attacked, she was being prevented from governing. And they knew it. That’s what they were intending to do.
They were going to bring her down. She had to answer all of these nonsense lawsuits and everybody who’s gone through one lawsuit knows the stress that puts on you. The time that it puts on you. The money it draws from you. She was being destroyed in her governance of the state and in her personal well being
What she did was she took the target and moved it. She took it away from Alaska. Great. She did a great service there. And smart as hell."
The only hope for saving the soul of the Catholic Church in America is the Vatican sending missionaries from the Catholic Church in Africa to help educate America Catholics the teachings of Catholicism.
I pray for the Catholics in America-everyday-may their souls be saved from the purgatory they led themselves into living.
"What you practice in your personal faith is not what you practice in your elected offical stance as you go by the laws of the land, not the laws of any cult religion."
Except for Catholic Kennedy Cult's 'Universal Health Care is a God-given right'? At Ted Kennedy's Catholics Death Mass was born the idolate-worhipped Obamacare.
I am praying God remove the veil from the eyes of American Catholics and give them ears to hear the errors of their ways.
Eatase, All Religons are Cults. Many think of the word Cult as some type of Evil meaning when in fact this in meaning is not the case. Then one could bring up the reality that many Religious Cults have a sub standard that goes against human life rights. Being one whoms Faith is personal and in touch without having to be controlled by doctrines made by people allows me to live 24/7 a very spiritual life. Cult Religions are not ruled as a Democracy. To many lives have been destroyed under the pretex of Cult Religions. Everyone to their own choice in how they get through this part of the journey of life. As for Palin and having Jon Voight speak for her, leads one to discover the criminal life of Jon Voights past life experiences. Then it would appear those who support Palin are those who lack substance in their own life journey. Her books sales have droped by 82% and she is a passing blink for those who lack the ability to understand the truth of her real agenda. Tea Baggers did not even know the meaning of Tea Bagging for months and then when they did they changed their name to the Tea Party. Tea Bagging is a Sexual Act between two Consenting Adults. It took a liberal to bring this to their attention. I would never join a group without first knowing about what they stand for and who is behind the curtain controlling the strings.
To follow Glenn Beck into darkness with Palin and Rush shows the limited ability to think for yourself. Jesus was not even born December 25. The Christmas Tree is a Pagan Holiday going back 400 years. All Theologians agree that Jesus was born in late Spring or Early Summer. So if this celebration is not an oxymoron, I do not know what is in December. The month of December is a Retail Business Holiday in todays society. Then since Emperor Bush and his Dick as in shoot your best friend in the face Cheney have caused the 'Daily' Suffering & Deaths of the American Poor, Disabled, Senior Citizens, Children, L.G.B.T. Community, Veterans and the Unemployed during their 8 years of Dictatorship, it left no finger prints at the crime scene. They caused the Worst Depression in the History of America. 27 Million Americans have been fired from their jobs and 7.2 Million Homes have been Foreclosed on. The Bush & Cheney Dictatorship have only provided for their 2% Rich. President Obama has done 24/7 to clean up the mess of the Emperor Bush and Dick Cheney Dictatorhip. President Obama is a great President but it will take generations to undo the damage of the Republican Racist Party of the 2% Rich. Merry Christmas? No I do not think for the 98% of Americans will be having a Merry anything. Sad. Take Care America 1 Minute at a time.
Post a Comment