Monday, September 26, 2016

Debate night...

which is not really a debate.

It's just some Kubuki theater to keep us peons happy and occupied.

But, it beats NFL.

Trump will be fine.

Hillary will eventually be shrill.

MSM will say she won.

The only potential loser will be Lester Holt.  He seems like a nice guy.  I wish him well.

And, what the hell is up with the price of snacks?  Hubby requested Cheetos for his debate snack.  A 7 1/2 oz bag of Cheetos at the grocery store was $3.25.  Are you kidding me???  Ah, sorry hun, you've been downgraded to Brims cheese thingy's from the Dollar Store (which are just as good as Cheetos.)

Lester Holt preparing to walk a tightrope 

Sunday, September 25, 2016

MSM declares Hillary winner of tomorrow's debate...

thought I'd get that out of the way early.

Because you know it's true.

It isn't going to matter what she says or does.  Short of having a grand mal seizure during the second half of the debate,  which would only gain her sympathy and praise for "powering through", she will be the hands down favorite.

No matter what Trump says or does, he will be labeled pushy, un-presidential,  ill-prepared, and "dangerous."

Lester Holt will challenge Trump's statements and twist everything he says.  Conversely, Holt will treat Hillary with delicacy and restraint.  Sure wouldn't want the world thinking he was a bully, now would we?

Afterwards, they will snip and clip smidgens of tape that will make Trump look bad and play them over, and over, and over.  If Hillary gets in one little morsel of humor it, too, will be played over and over.

Be prepared.

Don't be fooled. 


A great and uplifting post by our very own MOTUS:

Murmurations: When the beating of your heart echoes the beating of the drums.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Ted Cruz: When it's not okay to follow your conscience...

when the other person's conscience doesn't agree with you.

The nevertrump peeps are "outraged", "saddened", "disappointed", and "devastated", that Ted Cruz's conscience is allowing him to support and vote for Donald Trump.

Amanda Carpenter, a nobody with no influence, who used to be a senior staffer for Ted Cruz, retweeted:
@amandacarpenter sees no "evidence that Trump has changed his behavior to allow Cruz's conscience to support Trump"
 Since when is it your right to vet Cruz's conscience?  Is his conscience only right when he agrees with your stance?

Do these people not hear themselves?

Word is that Glenn Beck is on suicide watch. 


Breitbart:  Never Trump Heads Explode as Ted Cruz Backs Donald Trump for President

Friday, September 23, 2016

Ted Cruz endorses Donald Trump...

and we thank him

Via Facebook:

This election is unlike any other in our nation’s history. Like many other voters, I have struggled to determine the right course of action in this general election.

In Cleveland, I urged voters, “please, don’t stay home in November. Stand, and speak, and vote your conscience, vote for candidates up and down the ticket whom you trust to defend our freedom and to be faithful to the Constitution.”

After many months of careful consideration, of prayer and searching my own conscience, I have decided that on Election Day, I will vote for the Republican nominee, Donald Trump.

I’ve made this decision for two reasons. First, last year, I promised to support the Republican nominee. And I intend to keep my word.

Second, even though I have had areas of significant disagreement with our nominee, by any measure Hillary Clinton is wholly unacceptable — that’s why I have always been #NeverHillary.

Six key policy differences inform my decision. 


First, and most important, the Supreme Court. For anyone concerned about the Bill of Rights — free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment — the Court hangs in the balance. I have spent my professional career fighting before the Court to defend the Constitution. We are only one justice away from losing our most basic rights, and the next president will appoint as many as four new justices. We know, without a doubt, that every Clinton appointee would be a left-wing ideologue. Trump, in contrast, has promised to appoint justices “in the mold of Scalia.”

For some time, I have been seeking greater specificity on this issue, and today the Trump campaign provided that, releasing a very strong list of potential Supreme Court nominees — including Sen. Mike Lee, who would make an extraordinary justice — and making an explicit commitment to nominate only from that list. This commitment matters, and it provides a serious reason for voters to choose to support Trump.

Second, Obamacare. The failed healthcare law is hurting millions of Americans. If Republicans hold Congress, leadership has committed to passing legislation repealing Obamacare. Clinton, we know beyond a shadow of doubt, would veto that legislation. Trump has said he would sign it.

Third, energy. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s war on coal and relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry. Trump has said he will reduce regulations and allow the blossoming American energy renaissance to create millions of new high-paying jobs.

Fourth, immigration. Clinton would continue and even expand President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty. Trump has promised that he would revoke those illegal executive orders.

Fifth, national security. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism. She would continue importing Middle Eastern refugees whom the FBI cannot vet to make sure they are not terrorists. Trump has promised to stop the deluge of unvetted refugees.

Sixth, Internet freedom. Clinton supports Obama’s plan to hand over control of the Internet to an international community of stakeholders, including Russia, China, and Iran. Just this week, Trump came out strongly against that plan, and in support of free speech online.

These are six vital issues where the candidates’ positions present a clear choice for the American people.

If Clinton wins, we know — with 100% certainty — that she would deliver on her left-wing promises, with devastating results for our country.

My conscience tells me I must do whatever I can to stop that.

We also have seen, over the past few weeks and months, a Trump campaign focusing more and more on freedom — including emphasizing school choice and the power of economic growth to lift African-Americans and Hispanics to prosperity.

Finally, after eight years of a lawless Obama administration, targeting and persecuting those disfavored by the administration, fidelity to the rule of law has never been more important.

The Supreme Court will be critical in preserving the rule of law. And, if the next administration fails to honor the Constitution and Bill of Rights, then I hope that Republicans and Democrats will stand united in protecting our fundamental liberties.

Our country is in crisis. Hillary Clinton is manifestly unfit to be president, and her policies would harm millions of Americans. And Donald Trump is the only thing standing in her way.

A year ago, I pledged to endorse the Republican nominee, and I am honoring that commitment. And if you don’t want to see a Hillary Clinton presidency, I encourage you to vote for him.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Hillary Clinton speaks directly to white people: "Not only are you deplorable and irredeemable, but now you're unbearable"...

as she defends black thugs against police.

Funny - she didn't have anything to say about the white man beaten by blacks in Charlotte, or the reporter they tried to throw into a bonfire.

She also didn't have anything to say about swarms of black people (and some guilt ridden white people) destroying everything in their path.  She also didn't have anything to say about one of the rioters being shot in the head by another rioter. 

Hillary Clinton on the Steve Harvey radio show:
“We gotta tackle the systemic racism, this horrible shooting again. How many times do we have to see this in our country?” she said in an appearance on the Steve Harvey show. Clinton was specifically referring to the police shooting of Terence Crutcher in Tulsa, Oklahoma, saying he had his “hands in the air” when he was killed.

“This is unbearable and it needs to be intolerable,” she said.

Clinton told Harvey that if the African-American community came out and voted for her, she would work to stop racial shootings by police officers.

“Maybe I can by speaking directly to white people say, ‘Look this is not who we are,’” she said. “We’ve got to do everything possible to improve policing, to go right at implicit bias.
I watched the video.  Terence Crutcher's hands were not in the air.

Everything is about race for the libtards.  How about teaching black people how to respond to the po-lease?

There are millions of black and white people who get stopped every day by the po-lease.  99.999% of them do not get shot.  Wonder why.

She's telling white people "this is not who we are?"   How about telling black people who they are?

Listen up, you race baiting disaster of a human being - I know exactly who I am, and I don't need you or that pencil necked long legged mack daddy mulatto in the White House telling me who I am. 

I'm sick and tired of being the "bad guy" because I'm white.

That is all. Thank you for listening.



Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Where is Hillary?...

strangest campaign I've witnessed in my entire life.

How about you?

Hillary canceled a private fund raiser in North Carolina which was scheduled for yesterday, Tuesday, September 20th.
CBS reported that Clinton campaign officials said that a Tuesday fundraiser in Chapel Hill was postponed.
The Clinton event was billed as “lunch with Hillary Rodham Clinton” and had four donation levels to attend. Those contribution levels were described as $100,000, which featured “chair reception with Hillary,” $33,000, which included a “host reception with Hillary,” $5,000, which included “preferred seating” and $2,700.
No reason was given for postponement of the Clinton event, which was planned to take place at the home of Betty Craven and Michael Warner.
I can see only two reasons for cancelling a fund raiser. Either they couldn't sell enough tickets to be worth her time, or she's too sick to attend.

Today she's supposed to be doing a rally in Orlando, FL , and then has nothing else scheduled until the first debate on September 26th.

Meantime, Trump keeps packing them in.

So far I've been wrong about her dropping out.  However, I can think of only two reasons for her lack of campaigning.

Either she's too sick, or she's been assured the election is so rigged that she is going to be the winner no matter how many people vote for Trump.

I'm going with the second option.  I hope I'm wrong again.

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Donald Trump, Jr slanders innocent defenseless Skittles...

by comparing them to Muslims.

And the libtards go crazy defending Syrians.

Hillary's Wonky Lizard Eyes...


Did they purposely place her teleprompters far apart to mask her eye movement?

And what's with the bug eyes and head nodding?

Watch the numbers and stop at :58, 1:09, 1:10, 1:56, 2:04, 2:05

To save your sanity watch with the sound off.


H/T American Mirror

Kathleen Kennedy Townsend: George H.W. Bush will vote for Hillary...

really, Kathleen?

The echo chamber is alive and well in internet land repeating this over, and over, and over, and over again.  And the outrage and hate toward the Bush family is palatable.

Let me put this in perspective for all you Bush haters.

Ms. Townsend had a private conversation with H.W. Bush.  At least I'm sure he thought it was private.  She then proceeded to post on her Facebook page that George H.W. Bush was voting for Hillary.  And we are believe this, why?

From Politico:
On Monday, Townsend posted a picture on her Facebook page shaking hands next to the former president and this caption: "The President told me he’s voting for Hillary!!”

In a telephone interview, Townsend said she met with the former president in Maine earlier today, where she said he made his preference known that he was voting for a Democrat. “That’s what he said,” she told POLITICO.
What a despicable and classless thing to do, Kathleen.  And, furthermore, we don't even know if he actually made that statement. 
Asked about Townsend’s post, George H.W. Bush spokesman Jim McGrath in an email replied, "The vote President Bush will cast as a private citizen in some 50 days will be just that: a private vote cast in some 50 days. He is not commenting on the presidential race in the interim."
What the hell else was he supposed to say?  Deny it?  Affirm it?

No matter what you think of the Bush family, both H.W., and in particular George W., have pretty much stayed out of the political fray after leaving office, which is the way it should be.  George W. and Laura have poked their heads out for official remembrances and such, but other wise keep to themselves.  George paints (quite well, too) and Laura does whatever ladies do to amuse themselves.


Kathleen Kennedy Townsend - intellectually empty "Catholic"

Monday, September 19, 2016



Bill Whittle is someone who sees with soft eyes

Terrorists in the U.S.: What does the FBI know and when did they know it?...

and now reporting on "possible" terror cells.

I only have one thing to say about the recent terror attacks:

Within hours of the New York/New Jersey attacks five people had been arrested and another one, Ahmad Khan Rahami, identified.

Looking at this situation with "soft eyes" there is no doubt in my mind that these Muslims have been on the FBI radar for quite some time.  Granted, according to law, you can't arrest someone who hasn't committed a crime even if you suspect they "may" commit a crime.

So how do you put a stop to these attacks?  Don't let them in the country to begin with.  Simple.

But, Hillary wants to let in millions more.

Do they assimilate?


Here's a group of Somalis in Minneapolis protesting something or another.

And here they are, again in Minneapolis, demanding the food banks stock halal food. Tell me who moves to another country, is showered with free stuff, and than protests and complains about the quality of the free stuff?

St. Cloud, MN is slowly being turned into a third world hell-hole thanks to Lutheran Social Service.


Virtual Mirage:  Das dicke ende kommt noch!(The worst is still to come)

WND:  69 eye-opening facts about Hillary's VP pick  Check out his record on immigration.

Refugee Resettlement Watch:  Residents of St. Cloud, MN get more facts on refugee resettlement

Breitbart:   McDonalds Hires Foreign H-1Bs, Fires 70 American Accounting Staff  The figures are shocking.

PJ Media:   Minneapolis Star Tribune Blames 'Anti-Muslim Tensions' for St. Cloud Mass Stabbing by 'Soldier of the Islamic State'   Otherwise known as a "The Commie Rag.  Got that?  If we were just nicer to Muslims, they wouldn't stab us. 

Trump Speaks:

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Hillary Clinton: "I've been briefed about the bombings in New York and New Jersey and the attack in Minnesota"...

criticizes Trump for calling it a bomb.

In her statement, interspersed with 37 "ah's" in a period of approximately 2 1/2 minutes (I may have missed some), a barely awake (sedated?) Clinton managed to refer to a "bombing" and immediately denounced Trump for calling it a bomb.  Do these people hear themselves?

And how stupid is the "press" pool for asking:
“Do you have any reaction to the fact that Donald Trump, prior to taking the stage tonight, called the explosion tonight a bomb, and if that’s an appropriate term”?
Hey, dumbkopf, she just called it a "bombing" and you ask her about Trump calling it a bomb?  I hate that a Sunday should be marred by such abject stupidity. 

Someone who wants to be commander-in-chief, needs to be the type of person who, when awakened, needs to be awake - immediately.  There is no time for a leisurely pot of coffee and croissants.  If she's that foggy at midnight, what shape would she be when that 3am call comes in?

Not to be outdone, CNN's Don Lemon, flinging about his own numerous "ah's" commences to essentially back up Hillary in her denouncement of Trump.  Did he not hear what she said?  Apparently not.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Are you seeing with "hard" eyes or "soft" eyes?...

a new term for me.

Cruising about on the internet yesterday, I bumped into the term "soft eyes."  Not being a TV watcher, I had to look up the origin of the term.  It seems to be something a character, homicide Detective William "Bunk" Moreland, said to his new to homicide sidekick, Detective Shakima "Kima" Greggs, on a HBO series called The Wire (2002-2008).

When Bunk takes Kima out on her first homicide he says to her:
 "You know what you need at a crime scene?  Soft eyes….You got soft eyes, you can see the whole thing. You got hard eyes, you stare at the same tree, missing the forest."
Even though the show got rave reviews, it doesn't appear to be anything I'd ever want to watch. 

But I do like the term "soft eyes" instead of having to use an old hackneyed phrase like "not seeing the forest for the trees" or "let's look at the big picture."   It's quick, easy, and to the point - just the way I like things. 

Viewing internet news sources is definitely a hard eyes endeavor.  Everyone drills down to one aspect - lately Hillary's health.  It's  necessary when writing a post because if we tried to put everything into perspective, our posts would be miles long and no one would read them. Besides, I admit, in most cases, to not being able to put events in their proper order. 

The other problem is when we spend too much time reading, there is little time to analyze and try to see with soft eyes.  I've always had a penchant for seeing events with soft eyes.  It's one of the reasons I've always loved timelines.  For instance, if you study the Civil War and don't know what came before or after, it's almost impossible to properly understand the subject.

Which brings me to the point (thankfully.)

In looking at the fall of great nations, one thing stands out - the disregard and hostility to religion - in particular Christianity.

Is there anyone reading this who doesn't accept the fact that Christians are being marginalized and disdained in the United States?  And in third world countries they're being slaughtered in most horrific ways.

When a society is let loose from it's moral tethers based on religious belief,  mayhem and eventually destruction happens.  The nation will experience social, cultural, and moral decay. 

Our culture has become crude and ugly.  What passes for art is fecal matter smeared on a canvas and declared an innovative and courageous way of viewing the world.  Masses of people are festooning themselves in tattoos and poking multiple holes in their bodies and calling it beautiful. 

We now live in a nation that promotes diversity as being good, sexual immorality as a right, and discusses at what age it's okay to kill a baby in the womb. (Hint:  It's never okay.)  Marriage is no longer between a man and a woman, and if you dare say otherwise, you may be hounded out of your job.

And now we have front row seats to mainstream "churches" endorsing things that even 20 years ago would have been unthinkable.  The churches that thrive are those which promote a gospel of prosperity where loving God will make you rich.  You know you're in trouble when the very institutions which are supposed to uphold the moral tenets become just as secular and unholy as the lowliest sinner. 

Is the United States headed for a collapse?  If looking at history with soft eyes, the answer would have to be a resounding yes.  

If we drill down and look at our two candidates for president with hard eyes, we can quickly see that a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for the downfall of our country. She is a virulent proponent of all things anti-Christian.   A vote for Donald Trump, someone who has declared that persecution and marginalization of Christians in this country must stop, is clearly a better choice. 

 Based on viewing this race with soft eyes and then hard eyes, the choice becomes obvious, doesn't it? 


Self Evident Truths:    Quoting Myself - Today's Problem with Education Compared with Plato's Allegory of the Cave

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Full Trump Rally in Canton, Ohio 9/14/2016...

one of his best ever.

“It used to be cars were made in Flint, and you couldn’t drink the water in Mexico,” Trump stated. “Now, the cars are made in Mexico and you can’t drink the water in Flint.”

A few people showed up
Trump starts at 15:12

Mafia Rule One: Don't Put Anything in Writing...

the self-proclaimed elitist politicians should take a hint.

These people, who consider themselves our intellectual and moral superiors, are so freaking stupid that they spew their guts all over email which they consider "secure."

Nothing on the internet is secure.  Nothing.

We now have leaked emails of Colin Powell, leaks about DNC donors being awarded big political favors, and IT specialists for Clinton refusing to testify to the House Oversight Committee on deletions of some of Clinton’s emails.  One of them, Bryan Pagliano, didn't even bother to show up.

I don't remember when Trump said this, but I recall him saying in response to questions about Clinton's missing emails, that he probably wouldn't be using emails.

Ya think?

You'll have to trust me on this, but members of the mob, down to the lowliest foot soldier, learn early on to not put stuff in writing, to use code when speaking on the phone, and not to involve their families in their "business".  I'm sure by now, they've upgraded their security systems, but these general early rules still apply.

With all the secure communications available, although nothing is 100% secure, why are these high level politicians being swept up in hacking scandals?

And they consider themselves competent to rule over us "little people?  We'd be better off with Michael Corleone.
After Carlo is questioned by Michael on his involvement in setting up Sonny's murder and confesses he was contacted by Barzini, caporegime Peter Clemenza kills him with a garrote wire. Michael is confronted by Connie, who accuses him of having her husband killed. He denies killing Carlo when questioned by Kay, an answer she accepts. As Kay watches warily, Michael receives his capos, who address him as the new Don Corleone.
Don't be Kay!

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Does Hillary have subcortical vascular dementia?...


It was weeks ago when a so-called "leaked" doctor report on Hillary Clinton was thoroughly disdained and seemly debunked.  Since then, it's pretty much dropped off the radar.  For me, that's a red flag that there may be more to the report than originally thought.

Chief among the debunkers was with a lengthy post on August 16 repeating that Hillary, according to her doctor, was in "excellent" health, and that the documents "leaked" were fake, again, according to her doctor.

Of course, FactCheckers weighed in well before Hillary did a face plant on September 11th, in which even the liberal MSM deemed as troublesome.

In the report, with her doctor's name on the header,  subcortical vascular dementia was listed as a diagnosis. 

Subcortical vascular dementia is also known as Bisnswanger disease.
It was described by Otto Binswanger in 1894, and  Alois Alzheimer first used the phrase "Binswanger's disease" in 1902. However, Olszewski is credited with much of the modern-day investigation of this disease which began in 1962. source
The following video has been sitting in my tabs since September 7th.  As part of my due diligence, I researched vascular dementia, which comes in a number of different forms, and for a number of different reasons.

I then took a look at the account of the person who made the video. A member since April, 2014,  with videos that mostly concentrate on different conspiracy theories, some just plain ridiculous, does not mean that some of them do not contain a kernel of truth.  Viewership is quite high, with some in the millions.  Most of the videos are really quite silly, but is this one?

We've all been happy enough to jump on the "Hillary has Parkinson" bandwagon, a theory that I still think is the correct one.  However, a look at this video offers another possible explanation for her recent behavior.  

In due time we will all know the truth.  

Monday, September 12, 2016

Is Hillary Clinton going to be forced to end her run for president?...

I think so.

Just about everyone has seen the damning video of Hillary being dragged into her van after collapsing at the 9/11 memorial yesterday.  And yet, if you wander over to Huff and Puff, you can read comment after comment saying there is nothing wrong with her.  It was the heat, menopause, a touch of pneumonia, or her busy schedule that caused her to "stumble." Reading comments like that brings the concepts of normalcy bias and cognitive dissonance to whole different level.

I feel great!
Suddenly we find out she was diagnosed with pneumonia last Friday and suffered from dehydration.  Within hours of collapsing and being rushed, not to a hospital, but to her daughter's apartment, she comes waltzing out, claiming she feels "great."  Not one person is with her when she emerges from the apartment building.  I find that very odd. Was it really Hillary?

There's all sorts of unsubstantiated chatter about the DNC planning to have an emergency meeting to replace Clinton.  First of all, they can't do that.  Clinton would have to voluntarily step down.  Can she be "persuaded" to step down?  Of course.  Again, it's just chatter.

Most alarming is the fact that she cancelled fund raisers in California that were to be held today and tomorrow.  On Wednesday, she is scheduled to do a rally in Las Vegas which has not yet been cancelled.

My guess is that over the next two days there will be some strong pressure by the DNC for her step down.  If she does that, the Las Vegas rally would be a great place to introduce Biden and his running mate Elizabeth Warren.

Or could the dems demand a delay in the election until they regroup?  Sure it's unconstitutional, but we've all witnessed so many unconstitutional things going on, what's one more?

Your thoughts? 

You may feel "great", Hillary, but you look horrible.


Brian Joondeph:  Hillary’s Health no Longer just a Conspiracy Theory

Sunday, September 11, 2016