Who are the commie/libtards?...

a question worth exploring.

From Youtube:

How is America to be defined? By its failures or its triumphs? Today, there seems to be an obsession with the former and a dismissal of the latter. Is this dark vision of the freest and most prosperous nation on earth an accurate narrative or a cynical distortion? James Robbins, columnist for USA Today and author of "Erasing America," considers that question in this video. How we view America's past will very much shape America's future.




From the transcript (emphasis mine):

"George Orwell understood that the most effective way to destroy a people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history."

"History is much more than a collection of facts. History, and our understanding of it, tells us who we are as a people in the same way your personal memories and experiences define and shape who you are."

And there, my little cabbages is the key to the insanity.  If you grow up and associate with commie/libtards (and you're not too bright), you will take on their coloring, their thoughts, and their hatred for America.  Your mother was correct when she told you to not hang out with dirt bags or your chances of becoming dirty were very, very high.

We send our children to state run indoctrination centers, watch propaganda instead of real news, do not study real history books, and leave our Christian churches for the new age celebration of self or claim to be "spiritual, but not religious."   We read trash masquerading as literature and attend plays and movies filled with blatant sex and violence. 

Can these commie/libtards be saved from their own destruction?

Some can, as the Walk Away Campaign has proven, where thousands upon thousands have walked away from the insanity of the left.

The others?

I have concluded that the rest of the commie/libtards are either intellectually stunted or are most likely sociopaths, malignant narcissists, or psychopaths (choose your preferred mental illness) who are so steeped and marinated in hate, rage, and insanity that they best be ignored.

The problems arise when they thrust themselves into our lives in most unsavory manners.

Witness the tweets by the democrats vying with each other for the first prize of virtue signalling dishonesty concerning Brett Kavanaugh and the fake news article by the New York Times (hidden behind a pay wall.)  You can read about it at Breitbart.  The New York Slime has since walked back their claims.

Warren, who benefited from the lie of being an Indian, Harris, who wiggled her way up the political ladder on her back, O'Rourke who committed a hit and run DUI, Cory Booker, an advocate for violence, and Buttigieg, who has a propensity for unnatural carnal knowledge of other men have all called for the impeachment of Justice Kavanaugh based on a sexual assault that the victim doesn't remember and has refused to be interviewed about.

These people think nothing of attempting to destroy another person to enrich and promote themselves.  I call that evil. What do you call it?


More:

Newsbusters:  Networks Shamelessly Promote Dubious NYT Report Alleging Sexual Misconduct By Kavanaugh

Washington Examiner:  New York Times sinks its Kavanaugh claim with Editor's Note stating alleged victim 'does not recall the incident'

Gateway Pundit: Surprise! Latest Accuser behind Debunked Kavanaugh Hit Piece Is Clinton Lawyer and Obama, DNC Donor

American Thinker: Saturday Schadenfreude: Julian Castro's debate act costs him a third of his voters

CDN:  Smearing Brett Kavanaugh: NYT, Harris, and Booker live in glass houses

Kurt Schlichter:  Beto The Furry Is Less Amusing When He Calls For Violence Against American Citizens



Amazon Today

Save up to 20% on Vastar Tools  Some pretty cool stuff!

Posture Corrector for Women Men, Upper Back Posture Corrector Comfortable Adjustable Posture Support for Clavicle,Invisiable Back Brace for Neck Back Shoulder Pain Relief  27% Off  I have one and it works quite well.

An attack on Trump is an attack on his supporters...

"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."

Do you?




Amazon

Deals in Women's Jewelry

Halloween is coming:

Deals in Costumes and Accessories 

The people aren't buying into the NYTimes fake news and Cory Booker is an ignoramous...

just my observation.

The cooler heads in the room couldn't care less about an "anonymous" source spewing a bunch of nonsense that is 180° opposite of what is observable.

And don't fall for the headlines claiming the White House is in chaos over the New York Times headline.  Trump is doing what he does best - his job!

Moving on:

Against the Senate rules, Cory Booker publishes confidential Kavanaugh emails.

 I've already read them and I see not one thing that hurts Kavanaugh in any manner.



More:

The Night Wind:  TRUMP HUMBLES ARROGANT MEDIA AT CEREMONY

Virtual Mirage:  The Return of Hitler?

The Blaze:  Commentary: The NYT op-ed was a cowardly publicity stunt that will change no one’s mind


Amazon Today

I receive a teeny little kick back from Amazon when you purchase through my links - at no additional cost to you.  I appreciate you using my links more than you'll ever know, and I thank you.

Project Veritas pt 2: Does the New York Times Exploit Social Media & Manipulate the News?...

okay - that question was completely facetious.

The manipulation of social media is really the most important part of this video.

The next most important and fun part is witnessing that fool Dudich continuing to shoot off his mouth and make a complete fool of himself.

We also get to meet Earnest Pettie, Brand and Diversity Curation Lead,
 who is, like, as articulate as, like, Dudich, like, basically is, like really. LOL (insert emoji)

The New York Times is going to try and pass these two mooks off as not representative of who they really are.  They'll claim they're just a couple of low level employees and, really, like, not at all, like us, like, higher ups - the real brains of the paper.  You know, like, your "betters."  Whatevs.

Trust me on this:  This is exactly who these people are. All of them.  They believe that because they are smarter, better educated, more moral, they are allowed to do whatever is necessary to advance their progressive agenda - because they are better then us dirt people. 





At Amazon:

All sorts of WODFitters fitness gear on Deal of the Day. 


Some seriously cute Kindle Paperwhite covers.  43 designs to choose from.

Price:	$29.99
Sale:	$11.99 Free Shipping for Prime Members
You Save:	$18.00 (60%)

Super bigly thanks to everyone who orders cool stuff through my Amazon links.  I receive a small commission - at no additional cost to you. 

Project Veritas confirms what we already knew about the New York Times...

Nicholas Dudich, the audience strategy editor for the New York Times, shoots off his piehole and likely has already been fired.  Good job, Dudich. 

 Dudich sounds like a 9th grade girl:

"Like, after the Clinton campaign, I’m like, no I need to get back into news and keep doing s*** because, like, this isn’t going to change."

Yeah, like, keep it cool, 'cause like, we're counting on you, like, ya know?  LOL

The little dope has taken down his Linkedin profile.  Too bad.  He's going to, like, need it to get a new job.  Oh, like, wait. Does Starbucks, like, check Linkedin, like, for their new hires?  LOL

I have to wonder how someone who presents himself as an adult and talks like a high school freshman ever got through the interview process at the Times.  What does that say about them?  Like, ya know? LOL

Project Veritas' latest installment in the American Pravda series takes aim at The New York Times, the supposed "paper of record." In the first part of this series, Nicholas Dudich, Audience Strategy Editor for the Times' extensive video library speaks candidly about how his left political bias influences his editorial judgement and reveals an unusual connection to former FBI Director James Comey, and a strange association with domestic terror group Antifa.

The New York Times responds:

Based on what we’ve seen in the Project Veritas video, it appears that a recent hire in a junior position violated our ethical standards and misrepresented his role. In his role at The Times, he was responsible for posting already published video on other platforms and was never involved in the creation or editing of Times videos. We are reviewing the situation now.



Save up to 40% off Yost Vises and Clamps at Amazon today

The New York Times and Washington Post just proved that I can still be shocked by despicable behavior...

and the libtards call us deplorable?

The New York Times took the bait and printed personal tax returns of Donald, and his then wife Marla, in their shabby little newspaper.

Message to New York Times:

You're as dumb as stumps.  No one cares about 20 year old tax returns. 

Lame Cherry:

[...]What is being missed in this, is Donald Trump personally guaranteed, with his own money, almost a billion dollars in over 3 billion in debt caused by the Clinton economy. No one in business does this, as it makes paupers out of the rich, but Mr. Trump stands behind his business and that means his personal finances are involved too. Do not miss that, nor do not miss the fact that the reasons shares plunged and contractors were waiting to be paid, was because of Bill and Hillary Clinton ruining the economy, not Donald Trump.

The following must be explained, because most will be sucked in by envy and forget they are doing the same thing. Yes most of you have interest on money in  the bank, and you never report it and when the time comes for your tax deductions, you take everyone of them, and any money you should be taxed on, you make certain you do not pay taxes on it, because it is your money.

[...}The reality in this is  the New York Times committed another criminal act. First they were babying Jeb Bush and now running interference for sick old Hillary Clinton. The reality is Donald Trump is honest, filed his taxes, and survived Clintonomics, so that Trump industries is now solvent, is producing golf courses, hotels (spray painted by Black Lives Matter) and employing tens of thousands of people with good jobs. While the New York Times paid no taxes in 2014, and Hillary Clinton's foundation has been swindling a billion dollars a year from the poor, because that is why Warren Buffett, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Bill and Hillary Clinton have foundations, so they can live like kings, embezzle money and not pay taxes.

 And then, via a link from Breitbart to Washington Post:

The Washington  Post prints an article about a woman who has had some difficulties with anxiety implying that she is a typical Trump supporter.

Unfortunately, she let the snake from the Times into her home not realizing that reporters will say anything to gain access to you.  You do not ever speak to the press, because you will lose.  Her reward was to made to look like she was insane when, at least for me, she came across as someone I'd like to have over for dinner. 

I pray that she doesn't have a relapse over this horribly slanted article and I hope she now realizes how dishonest and vile the press is.

*           *          *

Washington Post:   ‘Finally. Someone who thinks like me.’

New York Times:   Donald Trump Tax Records Show He Could Have Avoided Taxes for Nearly Two Decades, The Times Found

CNN: Watch the two New York Times "journalists" squirm while they lie about their Trump hit piece.

despicable people doing despicable things.

Earlier today I posted the video of one of the women misquoted in a obvious hit piece on Donald Trump and his treatment of women that appeared in the New York Times on Sunday (5/15/2016) Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved with Women in Public.

Now watch the two New York Times "journalists" responsible for the hit piece, Megan Twohey and wimpy pajama boy Michael Barbaro, squirm while they obviously lie about the whole thing.

In their article, they tell the story of Trump's ex-girlfriend Rowanne Brewer Lane.

But the 1990 episode at Mar-a-Lago that Ms. Brewer Lane described was different: a debasing face-to-face encounter between Mr. Trump and a young woman he hardly knew. This is the private treatment of some women by Mr. Trump, the up-close and more intimate encounters.

CNN asked Twohey if Rowanne Lane used the word "debased." 

CNN: You did use the word debase in the piece. Is that a word that Rowanne used used or that the women you spoke to used? 

Notice the complete evasion of answering a direct question about using the word "debase" when describing the encounter as she stammers and stumbles through her non-answer.

Twohey: So we heard a variety of…I mean….the…the…descriptions of Rowanee was one of many voices….We really value the fact that…and I think that one of the things you’ll see is that…

and proceeds to describe how the article was formatted, yada, yada.  Only a liar does that. 

And don't miss pajama boy saying that Rowanne was "asked to put on a bathing suit."  No she wasn't.  According to Ms Lane, she was asked if she would like a bathing suit since she had just come from a photo shoot and was not prepared for a swim party.  Big damn difference.  I'm sure Mar-a-Lago is well stocked with new bathing suits for guests. 

My advice to anyone being interviewed by any news outlet is to carry a tape recorder or use your phone and record the entire interview.

Rep. Trey Gowdy: New York Times Doing PR Work For Hillary...

"I want to congratulate the New York Times. It only took 15 months for them to figure out how to spell Benghazi. So in another 15 months maybe their reporting will actually catch up with the truth."