Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Obama "comes out" in defense of unnatural sex and distorts Christian teaching...

and every Christian in the country should be offended and outraged.

I've noticed that almost no one has reprinted the "Christian" part of Obama's statement. 

Father John Zuhlsdorf has this to say:

[...]In endorsing unnatural sex, Obama invoked Christ’s Sacrifice on the Cross.
“This is something that, you know, [Michelle and I have] talked about over the years and she, you know, she feels the same way, she feels the same way that I do. And that is that, in the end the values that I care most deeply about and she cares most deeply about is how we treat other people and, you know, I, you know, we are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated…”
Christ’s Sacrifice?  The “Golden Rule”?

Christians understand that both are reflections of sacrificial love, charity, the former the ultimate example of the God man, the later human and earthly which echoes the former (cf. Luke 10:25-28).

Obama instrumentalized the Lord’s Sacrifice, the ultimate act of the love which is charity, to promote unnatural sex and the overturning of one of our most important societal bonds.

We, according to charity, must act for the true good of the other. It is not for the true good of another person to help them to sin or to undermine Christian morals.  But that is exactly what Obama is doing. This is an astounding example of both scandal and blasphemy.   It is beyond absurd to invoke the Lord’s Sacrifice in an attempt to violate our human nature and God’s laws.  read it all
Point 1. Memo to all of those who think homosexual "marriage" is all about laughter, lightness, and sugar plum fairies.  It's not.  It's about people who define themselves by the way they engage in sex.  In the case of men, it's about a dominate male inserting his erect penis into a submissive man's anus.  It's about all manner of physical assault that shortens the health and life of the men who participate. It is an act of violence that perpetrates a plethora of disease.

  Want to acquire a raging case of  AIDs or various forms of hepatitis?  The quickest way to accomplish that is to engage in unnatural sex acts.  All you people who are so worried about domestic violence should be made aware that homosexuals experience the highest rates of violence in their partnerships.

Do you suppose that Obama brought up these things when discussing homosexual "marriage" with his daughters?  And are we to believe that he forms his opinions on what a couple of children think about the issue?  Yep - when I want to form an opinion about a deep moral issue I always turn to 12 and 14 year old girls for wisdom and guidance. /sarc

Point 2.  What exactly is coming down the pike in the next few days?  This is clearly another diversion to keep everyone riled up and blah blahing.  Wait for the Friday night news dump for the next hammer to strike.  Count on it!!!

Point 3.  You people who call yourselves Catholics, you who voted for this human piece of trash and plan on voting for him again, should start shopping for another church.  I hear the Unitarian Universalist church has some openings.


The Health Risks of Gay Sex


Kamaryn said...

WHAT ABOUT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, LOL. You of course are entitled to your opinion, as well as is the President, but how does "Christian teachings" price as a pathway to change legislation on the basic right of an American citizen (marriage)??

Also, links to literature on how gay (NOT "unnatural") sex leads to "shortening the health and lives of men who participate" please?

Also, your views on lesbianism? Thanks!

Adrienne said...

You need to read point one again. As to the rest? Google it yourself.