The Democratic Party on Friday sued President Donald Trump's presidential campaign, the Russian government and the Wikileaks group, claiming a broad illegal conspiracy to help Trump win the 2016 election.The multi-million-dollar lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court says that "In the Trump campaign, Russia found a willing and active partner in this effort" to mount "a brazen attack on American Democracy," which included Russian infiltration of the Democratic Party computer network. sourceWhat in hell are they talking about?
You, the American people who voted for Trump, are so stupid that you allowed Russia to decide for you how to vote. Without Russian interference you deplorable homophobic xenophobic hillbilly dirt people would have lined up to cast a vote for an alcoholic, lying, immoral, mean spirited, soulless, murdering slob of a woman.In the meantime, I have a bunch more trees to prune and spray.
| Price: | $19.99 |
| With Deal: | $8.87 |
| You Save: | $11.12 (56%) |
Confirmation Bias: is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs.We heard cheers, they heard jeers. We see a man standing up for the National Anthem, they see a man with a advanced case of Alzheimer who can't remember the words. Never occurred to the fools that there was an obvious delay in the music. Duh!
| List Price: | $59.99 |
| Deal of the Day: | $31.49 |
Ends at midnight
| |
| You Save: | $28.50 (48%) |
“This notion that suddenly this is a terrible thing, it verges on being insane. But this whole story, and I worry – I don’t actually worry about the substance. I worry about the investigative process and the degree to which sooner or later somewhere, somebody will engage in a mistake, and that mistake will now become the problem, not the original act, not the original accusation.”
Signorile (why's a nice Italian boy having sex with other boys??) is famous for liking to "out" other homosexuals and his activism over AIDS.This is how he plans to save America:
It's time to move beyond polite protests within specified boundaries. It’s time to escalate the expression of our outrage and our anger in a massive way.
Starting today and from here on, no elected official ― certainly those in the GOP defending and supporting Trump on a variety of issues, for example ― should be able to sit down for a nice, quiet lunch or dinner in a Washington, DC eatery or even in their own homes. They should be hounded by protestors everywhere, especially in public ― in restaurants, in shopping centers, in their districts, and yes, on the public property outside their homes and apartments, in Washington and back in their home states. White House officials too ― those enabling the authoritarian ― need to be challenged everywhere, as do all those at the conservative think tanks who support Trump and those who publicly defend him in their columns and on television.
There's much more and if you have some time to waste you can read the rest.The elected officials and White House staffers must be challenged going to and from their cars and at the many public speeches they give at organizations and think tanks throughout DC and elsewhere. They should be bombarded with questions and placards by groups of people as they head to media appearances at the cable networks where they spew their lies every day. And they should be challenged when they come off TV for what they just lied about.These people also attend functions and fundraisers at night (which are easy to locate), and these events should be disrupted, inside and out, until these politicians answer to the recklessness in which they are engaged. Paul Ryan, the House Speaker, should not be able to attend any function, eat in public, or enjoy dinner at home without hearing people expressing how his actions are harming their lives and their families’ lives in terrible ways.
“I cannot defend the director's handling of the conclusion of the investigation of Secretary Clinton's emails,” Rosenstein wrote, “and I do not understand his refusal to accept the nearly universal judgment that he was mistaken. Almost everyone agrees that the director made serious mistakes; it is one of the few issues that unites people of diverse perspectives.”
As a Christian, I cannot help but notice that leftists hate America's Christian roots. They have a huge problem with the God of Christianity and with Jesus. Think about it. Islam justifies beating and killing a disobedient wife and beheading homosexuals. And yet leftists, who claim to be superior advocates for women and homosexuals, defend Islam. Meanwhile, they vilify Christians, calling them intolerant haters for simply honoring biblical principles. At least 90% of leftist sacred cow issues are anti-Bible. Why? Read the Rest
 |
| Heather MacDonald |
Affirmative action admittances and charity scholarships for Members Of The African-American Community are heartwarming in theory, and make touching brochure photos, but at some point y'gotta ask, who's bringing who to whose level? The boorish Black Lives Matter hysterics at Claremont College suggest the answer.
If college students are the Best and the Brightest, what can diversity—i.e., not the best, not the brightest—actually add? Doesn't such diversity, by definition, lower the level of exchange? Facts on the ground say it does. Preventing others from hearing a speaker is not argument, nor are slogans shouted in unison dialogue. But it is diverse.
If "the rich tapestry of diversity" is as indispensable as claimed, there's no need toOur friend, GeeeZ, had the honor to lunch with MacDonald and said she's even more charming in person.hirerecruit The Diversity, a couple of unescorted nights in The African-American Community would teach students all they need to know.
In the video below the congressman outlines how Donald Trump fails all applied social litmus tests for conservative purity because Mr. Trump is not: religious enough, preachy enough, politically correct enough, and in a general sense is too crass for the moral authority wing of the religious right.
As Congressman Huelskamp outlines, those who are elected to legislate on appropriate bathroom issues, tone and manners, gender roles, as well as appropriate hem lengths, distance between dance partners and the dangers of modern cultural music, are aghast that a republican electorate would consider such vulgar “New York values” (<— yes Alice, he actually said that).
Watch the video below and you’ll see exactly why “Religious Purity Conservative Republicans” lose elections:He starts off by saying he wouldn't let his 9-year old watch a Donald Trump rally and neither would all the soccer moms and baseball dads, either. I'm not sure how he knows this, as he proceeds to call Trump "vulgar" and "crass."
First of all, Donald Trump may turn out to be the most effective anti-left leader in our lifetime. He is against political correctness. He is against bureaucracy. He places American nationalism first which I think we desperately need. I’m tired of being told we have to phony agreements and phony efforts and I watch John Kerry rush from five-star hotel to five-star hotel trying to get a phony peace agreement that is an absurdity… I think Trump could be a return to a more of an Eisenhower kind of realism that none-the-less is conservatism. And he may do more to dismantle the left than anybody in our lifetime… The other side is, if you’re not for Donald Trump, you’re effectively for Hillary Clinton.
