Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Worshiping the Lord in the Beauty of Holiness
November 28, 2005
Fr. Jay Scott Newman
*


****I was baptized in the Episcopal Church, and there I learned to worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness. When I became a Catholic, one of the most difficult adjustments for me was learning to accept the generally wretched state of the sacred liturgy in most parishes: banal language, casual atmosphere, mediocre secular music, ugly buildings badly decorated. In all too many places, the result is simply unspeakable. But this need not be.

****The Catholic Church gave us Chartres and Canterbury; she gave us plainchant and Palestrina. The Catholic Church saved the language of Cicero, and gave birth to the Christian poetry of the West. The cultural and artistic riches of the Western Church are still in our storehouse; we need only deploy them in a way adapted to the present structure of the Roman Rite.

****I have been a priest for more than twelve years, and in that time I have served four parishes, one college chaplaincy, and one seminary. In all of those posts, the following characteristics were observed (mutatis mutandis), and the results were splendid. I offer these suggestions for those who seek to "re-enchant" the sacred liturgy for the purpose of leading those who worship more deeply into the Paschal Mystery.

For the building and its contents


  1. The tabernacle MUST be on the rear wall of the chancel and on the central axis of the church. Putting the LORD anywhere else turns everything else on an angle, and no ideological justification will change the way in which this simple fact destabilizes the liturgy.

  2. The priest's chair should face the ambo, not the congregation, and it should ideally be located on the opposite side of the altar from the ambo. When he is seated, the celebrant (like the congregation) should be facing the proclamation of the Word of God; to have him face the people from his chair makes him the focus of attention and invites him to behave like a talk show host.

  3. Right angles are preferable to oblique ones. The eye senses rest when it follows one line to a 90 degree angle with another line; it senses motion when any other angle is present. One of the reasons many of our churches do not feel like peaceful houses of prayer to most folk is that the entire building and all of its furnishings are constantly "in motion."

  4. The altar candles should rest on the mensa, not on the floor around the altar. The passion for the "naked altar" is bizarre, pagan, and antiquarian for its own sake. Yes, the rubrics do allow for the candles to be on or near the altar, but I believe that placing them on the mensa has an immediate effect towards the re-enchantment of the liturgy.

  5. Avoid kitsch in all its forms, including most especially the trendy and sentimental, in decorating the church. Most churches look like someone's Italian or Irish grandmother has just finished sprucing up the place. Is it any wonder we have such trouble convincing our men that religion is not women's work? The sanctuary is the home of the Son of Man; let's make it look like a place in which most men would be comfortable spending a little time.

For the sacred music

  1. Stop balkanizing the Mass schedule with different types of music. This trick comes from Protestant church growth strategies, and it teaches our people that divine worship is just a matter of personal taste. Yes, progressive solemnity can distinguish one Mass from another in a large parish (low Mass, sung Mass, solemn Mass, etc.), but the basic approach to matters musical should remain essentially the same.

  2. If the choir is visible to the congregation, move them to a place where they will not be. This is absolutely essential to celebrating liturgy as worship rather than liturgy as entertainment. Yes, Anglicans more or less successfully replaced priests with lay choirs in the chancel, but for several different reasons, that simply does not work in the contemporary Roman Rite. The ideal place, of course, is a loft for organ and choir at the rear of the church. Failing that, at least move them to the back of the church.

  3. Sing only sacred music. Much of what is now marketed as "liturgical music" is not sacred at all, and congregations addicted to that pablum are not capable of entering the liturgy as a participation in the worship of the Heavenly Jerusalem. Sacred music is a happy marriage of text and music, and both halves are necessary to re-enchant the liturgy.

  4. If you sing hymns, sing the whole hymn. Stopping after the second verse because Father is at his chair makes as little sense as reciting half the Creed. And no "closing hymn" is needed. "The Mass is ended, go in peace" means what it says. Where possible, the priest and ministers should depart the sanctuary to an organ postlude or something comparable.

  5. The Anglican, Methodist, and Lutheran traditions have given us an extraordinary treasury of hymnody, most of which can be used in the Catholic liturgy with very little adaption. This music has proven itself to be durable, effective, and sacred. Do not be afraid of using hymns from this patrimony because they are "Protestant." In truth, these texts are far more orthodox and "Catholic" than most of the tripe published by Catholics in the past two generation.

  6. Plainchant was, is, and ever shall be the music best suited to the Roman Rite. Teach your musicians and your people some simple chants, and sing them well. Even those who struggle with Latin grammar will not need to be taught that this is sacred music.

For the congregation

  1. Silence is indispensable. No talking before Mass. Teach them to be comfortable with prolonged sacred silences during the liturgy by explaining that we're not just waiting for the next thing to happen; we're waiting together for the LORD.

  2. Teach them all the gestures proper to them, e.g. profound bow in the Creed, striking the breast at the Confiteor, kneeling at all appropriate times, etc. If the liturgy is just talking, talking, talking, then half the human person is left out of worship.

  3. Emphasize coming early and stigmatize leaving early. Being casual about being on time renders the entire activity casual. Ditto for clothing. Same for the eucharistic fast.

  4. Give constant, clear, and firm instruction about who should and who should not receive Holy Communion. Nothing desacralizes the sacred liturgy more than sacrilegious Communions, and the people need to be told this regularly. If you are not in full communion with the Church, if you are married outside of the Church, if you are in serious sin (including missing Mass on a Sunday or a Holy Day) and have not yet been to Confession: DO NOT EAT AND DRINK YOUR OWN CONDEMNATION. Reasserting that the Most Holy Eucharist is the most sacred reality on earth and not to be profaned by unclean lips will go a long way towards sorting out the McChurch atmosphere that poisons our souls.

For the priest

  1. Say Mass as though the people were not present. This means that the priest is thinking about, speaking to, and turned towards the Most High God. Paradoxically, it is this benign neglect of the people that gets the person of the priest out of the way and invites the people into the most intimate participation in the sacred mysteries. This is now counter-intuitive to most priests, who were taught that their first, last and constant job is make the people "feel welcome," but it is absolutely and unconditionally true: say Mass as though they are not there, and they will start to say things like, "That's the first time in 40 years I feel like I've been to Mass." Guaranteed.

  2. Naturally, when speaking to the people, the priest must look at them. But except when speaking directly to the people, the priest's entire attention (shown by posture, direction of eyes, etc.) must be directed away from the people and towards the Throne of Grace. For example, the Collect is not addressed to the congregation. Why face the people when you are speaking to the great I AM? And in the Eucharistic Prayer, the words "Take this all of you.." are NOT directed to the congregation, so when you say those words, Father, DO NOT look at the people. The entire Anaphora is directed to God the Father, so do not look at your congregation when you are speaking to the Ancient of Days.

  3. Eliminate the words of introduction in the entrance rite. Simply cut them out completely. This little interlude is one of the worst mistakes in the 1970 Missal; it's like pulling the emergency brake on a train moving at 80 mph: the whole thing comes crashing to a disturbing halt. Give one homily, and give it when you should ... in the homily. No off the cuff remarks, no improvisation after Holy Communion.

  4. To the maximum extent possible, hide your personality under the chasuble. Who the celebrant is ought to be as nearly insignificant as possible. The priest's job is to pull back the veil between God and man and hide himself in the folds, and this task is made nearly impossible by the ever expanding personality of "The Presider" who feels compelled to intrude his personality into every part of the sacred liturgy. The people aren't there to see us, Father, and if they like our jokes, then we can let loose at cocktail parties. But not in the liturgy.

  5. Sing the liturgy. Most parishes sing around the liturgy, but the liturgy is meant to be sung. Unless a priest is truly tone deaf (and even then he can learn to sing recto tono), he should sing, at least at Solemn Masses, nearly every word out of his mouth. From "In the Name of" to "The Mass is ended" and including most especially the Eucharistic Prayer (in whole or at least the words of the institution narrative), the priest should sing the liturgy. In the Christian East, it was once clear that a man who could not sing had no priestly vocation. I wouldn't go that far, but singing the priestly prayers is an essential part of the sacred liturgy, and when it is done well, the re-enchantment of the liturgy is literally at hand.

  6. Remember that every liturgy leaves chronological time and enters kairotic time. In chronos we say Good Morning; in liturgical kairos we say Dominus vobiscum. If we do not depart from the texts of the Church, then we stand a fair chance of taking the people with us into the never ending liturgy of the New Jerusalem. This is also why SLOW walking, talking and gestures are important. Same with hiding street clothes under sacred vesture. Ditto for the athletic shoes of the altar boys.

  7. Yes, that's altar boys, not androgynous altar servers. Want to encourage young men in the parish to think about the priesthood and all the men to take seriously their responsibilities for masculine headship? Then restrict the service of the altar to boys and young men.

What's This About?

Remember that the cult of the ugly and the mundane was forced upon the Church in the service of an ideology. And if 40 years ago there was any doubt that this ideology is the enemy of the Gospel of Christ, there can be no doubt now. A bare ruined choir is all that is left in many corners of the vineyard, but even (and sometimes especially) in the ruins, God can make all things new.

In the service of this renewal, or re-enchantment:

  1. Take Cardinal Mahony's pastoral letter on the celebration of parochial liturgy and throw it on the fire. Watch it burn. Now go take a hot shower.

  2. Reject the ideology that got us here. Root and branch, cut it out of yourself. Empty seminaries, despoiled religious orders, plummeting Mass attendance, and wholesale immorality among clergy and laity alike are probably pretty good clues that the vocation to holiness which is our baptismal second birthright is getting obscured along the way.

  3. Read good books that will help you understand the real nature and purpose of the sacred liturgy. Two excellent places to start are The Spirit of the Liturgy by Joseph Ratzinger (who now goes by a new nom de plume) and Looking at the Liturgy by Aidan Nichols, O.P. For the mechanics of celebration, start with Peter Elliott's Ceremonies of the Modern Roman Rite and Ceremonies of the Liturgical Year.

  4. Now approach the altar in spirit and truth, and worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness.

*

11 comments:

irene said...

This one is a little hard to swallow when the good Father starts taking issue with Holy Father, the Councils, and the Bishops.

No question that some of his individual points are well taken. But his overarching focus on little items of form (items which are theologically indifferent, different in different rites, and in essence matters of taste and custom) and sweeping condemnation of everything post-Pius XI reflect seriously on his obediance.

Suffice it to say that there is nothing "wrong" with the 1962 mass. But neither is there anything "wrong" with the 1970 mass. Supplement either one with Benedictine chant, Russian chant, traditional protestant hymns (suitably edited), traditional Catholic hymns, or 20th century compositions -- all are valid, though not all match one person's particular taste.

Similarly with architecture. Chartres indeed is heavenly, as is the very different Rosary Cathedral in Toledo. But there are post-WWII churches that also are reverent and inspiring (that does not necessarily include Mahoney's folly).

I am old enough that Pius XI was on the throne of St. Peter when I was a young child. But I feel no nostalgia for mass with a priest who ignores the laity, a language which only a small minority understand, and antiquarian music and furnishings. I will not say "That's the first time in 40 years I feel like I've been to Mass." the next time I attend a Tridentine mass.

Dear Father, please consider the virtue of obediance.

Rachel said...

Irene, I see that your profile says you're 21 and a mother of two young children, but in your comment you claim to have been born by 1939. This makes me wonder if your post is meant to be taken seriously, but in any case I'll rise to the bait. :)

When you say Fr. Newman is taking issue with Holy Father, the Councils, and the Bishops, I wonder if you know what they say on these matters. This article by Fr. Newman is very much in the spirit of Pope Benedict XVI and follows the Vatican II document on the liturgy. What Fr. Newman takes issue with is those who misinterpreted Vatican II as an invitation to do whatever they pleased. The Pope himself has talked about abuses that came after VII, and the pain they caused, and he has called for "a reform of the reform" which is pretty much what Fr. Newman means here. Note that he highly recommends the Pope's book on the liturgy-- that's hardly taking issue with him!

If you're going to accuse him of disobedience I wish you'd be specific. Can you name one thing the Church hierarchy has commanded that Fr. Newman's not doing, or one thing they've forbidden that he is doing?

He certainly never made any "sweeping condemnation of everything post-Pius XI". Also, he never mentioned the 1962 rite or saying Mass in Latin. He's talking exclusively about the 1970 Mass, the ordinary form, which is the only one he celebrates. You don't seem to have read his article carefully.

There are different allowable forms of music, true, and Fr. Newman himself advocates hymns as well as chant in this article. But when he says that Plainchant is the music most suited to the Roman Rite he's obediently following the Vatican II document on the liturgy, which says the same thing, that Gregorian chant has pride of place.

When you complain about a priest who "ignores the laity", I wonder if you've even tried to understand what Fr. Newman wrote. I hope you don't just dismiss him as proud-- to me it's wonderful, and the opposite of pride, that he wants to keep his own focus and the people's focus on God and not himself. Why would that irritate anyone?

Mark D. said...

Thanks for posting this. What a remarkable reflection by Fr. Newman. His suggestions are good ones and should be taken to heart. What Irene dismisses as "little items of form" are in fact details that matter a great deal. Faithful in little is faithful in much, after all.

X said...

open email.
hit create mail.
click on Adri's blog.
highlight this post.
copy.
paste.
send to bishop.

thank you.

Motherhen said...

Thanks for posting this Adrienne. I wish we had more priests like Fr. Newman.

belinda said...

As a convert I love reading this stuff. I will print a copy for myself for later. Thank you.

Joe said...

I think that Fr. Newman's liturgical sensibilities are spot on. I would add a few more recommendations:

1) Turn the priest around so that he is facing the right direction, not the people.

2) Get rid of musical instruments altogether and sing the whole Mass in Gregorian Chant (English translations if need be).

3) Clergy should wear beards as a sign of their apostolic and Christ-given authority and should normally wear cassocks under their vestments, even outside of liturgy.

4) Forbid communion in the Hand.

5) Forbid Lay Eucharistic Ministers. Only a Bishop, Priest, or Deacon should touch the Holy Bread or the Holy Chalice. If there are not two clergy members to distribute both the body and blood, then have the priest distribute both by intinction. Also, along with male-only altar servers, it should be canon law that women are never to be in the altar area for any reason. For us in the East, this is easy since we have an iconostasis separating the altar from the rest of the Church. But perhaps reinstituting communion rails would do the trick.

6) Institute the practice (borrowing from the east) of using a blessing cross to give the final blessing. At the conclusion of the Liturgy, have the people come to the front to kiss the cross and the priest's hand. Institute chanting by the cantors while people are lining up and going forward.

7) During the distribution of communion, forbid any hymn or song that is not about Holy Communion or receiving Christ in some real sense.

8) Reinstitute the other prayer services of the Church such as Matins and Vespers. Ban the Saturday evening Liturgy and replace it with Vespers. Also, offer only one Mass per altar on any given liturgical day. If everyone can't fit into the church, then build a bigger one.

9) Ban all children's liturgies and children's sermons.

10) Institute the forthcoming new English translation of the Mass as soon as possible and as completely as possible.

11) Incense, Incense, Incense! Require by Canon Law that incense be used at EVERY liturgy.

belinda said...

Now if I agree with Joe, will you people beat me up like the holy souls over on facebook? I've been slapped silly by the kind of Catholics that I don't want to be like.

Elisabeth said...

WHOA!!! Is this THE Father Jay Scott Newman of Greenville, SC, who's in the hot seat right now for warning parishioners that, if they voted for Obama, they need to make a thorough examination of conscience and go to Confession for materially cooperating with the evil of abortion....

Adrienne said...

the same!

Joe of St. Thérèse said...

I got a little chuckle out of the comment on Cardinal Mahony's letter. I didn't exactly burn it, I just threw in comments that destroyed it :)